Re-reading
Proust, the thousands of squares that comprise his sustained memory play, which
we look at with why, wherefore, when, what, who… Sometimes it looks easy. Even
one square is at once a matter of wonder and questions. As when Marcel, by
surprise, receives a letter from the source of his secret passion, Gilberte:
“And thought cannot instantly assimilate a sheet of paper covered in letters.”
Like getting text from the very person we would least expect, but delight in.
Instead of reading each word like city streets of passing shops, there’s only
gorgeous rain filling vision from June skies.
Showing posts with label Marcel. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Marcel. Show all posts
Wednesday, 7 June 2017
Friday, 2 June 2017
Book (June)
Re-reading Proust we find that a certain woman “keeps
spouting books at you” and is, dismissive judgement, therefore tiresome. On the
same page someone else is thought a good sort, even though it’s unlikely she’s
read all ‘The Critique of Pure Reason’. Between these two criticisms the salon
weaves, from expectations of being well-read and those of not advertising the
fact. One will be choice in how quotes are quoted, be well-read and informed
but wear it lightly. Other expectations are implied: one must be original but
not too so, entertaining but not exhausting, slightly mysterious like a June
night.
Thursday, 11 May 2017
Persistent (May)
Re-reading
Proust. Former Macleod resident Gerald Murnane, for whom Macleod’s hillside
views are now a memory he may wish to memorialise, once wrote an essay entitled
‘Invisible Yet Enduring Lilacs’. Marcel, or Proust, or both, are the author of
this line. Much depends on the word ‘persistants’. Most translators say ‘enduring’
lilacs that last for as long as his memory, and the words they honour. But one
translator has ‘indestructible’, which is effective, but is it true? When I
gaze at Macleod hillsides how can they be less real than my memory of them? For
now, my memory is indestructible.
Wednesday, 10 May 2017
Cruelty (May)
Re-reading Proust. Mademoiselle Vinteuil is cruel to her
father, the very one who adores her. Beyond the grave, she and her friend play
ritual games that profane his memory. Memory, Marcel’s prime occupation,
divides along trauma lines. What’s a novelist, like him, if not a merciless
remaker of those he knew, of whom many loved him? Yet time may transform these
thoughtless sadistic games, pleasurable at the time, into guilt or remorse or
self-reflection. Praise, even. Mademoiselle Vinteuil grows up to be the
thankful overseer of her father’s musical estate, archivist of his time-bound
creations, protector of his good name.
Tuesday, 9 May 2017
Gears (May)
Re-reading
Proust. “I heard her snoring lightly. I was going to go away quietly, but the
noise I had made had probably interfered with her sleep and made it ‘shift
gears’, as they say about cars, because the music of her snoring broke off for
a second and resumed on a lower note…” She is Marcel’s reclusive aunt, Léonie.
Comic anachronism is disarming. The first mention of an automobile reminds us
the story opens before their popularisation. Until now things were “reined in”;
the coach awaited; people took long walks in May sunshine. Léonie probably never
travelled in a car.
Monday, 8 May 2017
Longer (May)
Re-reading
Proust. But how? The concept of the longueur became a given of
nineteenth-century fiction. Some passages, obviously, were going to take longer
to linger through than others. But what to do with a novel that turned into
novels, the stylistic foundations of which are longer and longer diversions,
each linked or overlapping in some way the narrative, if we may call it a
narrative? Within each long aside, or essay, are unexpected details subtly
introduced, that lend to our longer understanding extra depth, light,
significance, character. Should this be poetry like Scott Moncrieff? Rigour, like
Kilmartin? Bluntness, like Grieve?
Thursday, 4 May 2017
Fashion (May)
Re-reading Proust. “We would
go into what he called his ‘study’, whose walls were hung with some of those
engravings depicting… a fleshy pink goddess driving a chariot… which were
admired during the Second Empire because they were felt to have a Pompeiian
look about them, were then hated, and are beginning to be admired again for one
reason and one only, despite the others that are given, and that is that they
have a Second-Empire look about them.” For engravings, read posters. For
goddess, read King of May. For Second Empire, read The Sixties. For Pompeiian,
read San Francisco.
Wednesday, 3 May 2017
Asparagus (May)
Re-reading Proust. After the madeleine story, he ripples
out pictures of childhood Combray, recalls a kitchen discussion about the
virtues of asparagus. This unlikely vegetable turns slowly into the perfect
mnemonic, proving that anything sensual may serve as a madeleine. I consider
how memory is provoked in me. My grandmother’s trays of fruit-mince slice. Her
chocolate gingers. Or my mother’s very exotic chow mein, in particular the
salty soy sauce. ‘What is patriotism but the love of the good things we ate in
our childhood?’ asks Lin Yutang. Asparagus was fine soft, but being Australian
we called it ‘sparra’s guts’.
Tuesday, 2 May 2017
Madeleine (May)
Re-reading Proust. His choice of a cake called Magdalene
is a risky tribute, a bold connection. The women-filled pages of Combray
Chapter One culminate with the eating of food named, indirectly, after the
First Witness to the Resurrection. Marcel says this happened on Sunday mornings
“because that day I did not go out before it was time for Mass.” Tribute,
maybe; connection, surely; and guide to how memory may be both unwilled and
then willed. The madeleine, dipped in tea, is discovery and invocation of the
Muse; scallop-shelled cakes, reminder of Saint James, that provide one guide to
Proust’s procedure.
Monday, 1 May 2017
Personality (May)
Re-reading
Proust. We trust this is all about him, but then we’re told, “Our social
personality is a creation of the minds of others.” Each one of us knows we’re
not the person others would have us be. We live, certain we are not a type,
even when every day we speak and behave true to type. We learn to live with the
ideas we have of other people. The personality we have created for each one of
them may be, but is not, their true self. We ourselves live with ourselves, a personality
no one may imagine, like Marcel.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
