August 2 Unica
A book of which there is only one copy in the
world, by chance or design, is called a unica, or sometimes unicum. A
collection of such books might be called unicas. Georges Perec is where I first
encountered the term, not surprisingly given the Frenchman’s delight in the
curiosities of literature which he puts, not in a cabinet of curiosities, but page
one in the centre. Writers the world over live with the sense the manuscript
they are working on could remain, for eternity, a unica. Many handmade books
are unicas. It happens that the University of Illinois has initiated a Project
Unica “to produce high quality facsimiles of printed books that exist in only
one copy.” Preservation must be one objective, though the university says it is
“to provide a simple and efficient way of getting this valuable and unique
information to scholars when and where they need it.” The university does not
say what it does then with the original copy, but we would like to believe it
is not the procedure reported today inside Automatic Increase (AI) copying
operations. It seems that second-hand booksellers are being inundated with bulk
orders for unusual, out-of-date, and rare books from certain companies, that
then cut up the book for easy scanning only to throw away the original. The
sellers say they are not concerned about those Gutenberg descendants available
in thousands, but do not mail a unica to Active Invisibles (AI) on principle.
The vision that emerges is unresplendent: a unique monograph is destroyed after
being replaced by an intangible digital substitute, its fungibility
questionable. With only the digital version in existence, and no catalogue
proof of its original, can I be certain of its authenticity? The university is
at pains to claim their facsimiles are high quality for good reason: the
history of reprint companies in the past three decades is speckled with smudgy
text that says something different from the original. The argument being, only
the original will always state clearly, print face in cloth paper, what is
actually being said. There is also the possibility of creatives producing unica
online from the Reformation or Enlightenment that never had an original, that
is to say, are hoaxes. The publication date may read AD MDC (1600) even when,
to be accurate, it should read AI (Anno Ingenium) MMXXVI (2026). Shakespeare
could say more things than are dreamt of in your philosophy or are currently
attributed to him in the First Folio. What an opportunity for Brainless Bards! Authorial
Inventiveness (AI) can invent text to suit from every period style, as well as
inventing the author who made the text. While this is likely to generate unica
all of its own, whether anyone will want or trust such productions is doubtful.
The books they imitate, or rip off in fact, are not being made with a reader in
mind.


