Re-reading
Proust. But how? The concept of the longueur became a given of
nineteenth-century fiction. Some passages, obviously, were going to take longer
to linger through than others. But what to do with a novel that turned into
novels, the stylistic foundations of which are longer and longer diversions,
each linked or overlapping in some way the narrative, if we may call it a
narrative? Within each long aside, or essay, are unexpected details subtly
introduced, that lend to our longer understanding extra depth, light,
significance, character. Should this be poetry like Scott Moncrieff? Rigour, like
Kilmartin? Bluntness, like Grieve?
No comments:
Post a Comment