Are
you a narcissist or an empath? To play this social media quiz question you
click three colours and hope you don’t come up trump. How this divides
statistically is hard to gauge. Are there more empaths per capita in the city
or the regional and rural areas? Which political party has the most narcissists?
Hard to gauge while the determining judge is artificial intelligence, one that
is trained up to colour matching but not emotional range. It is hard to take
the word ‘empath’ seriously. It originates in science fiction, a person with
the paranormal ability to perceive the mental or emotional state of an
individual. This has to be an improvement on seeing through said individual using
X-ray vision, though it’s a question what it says about the emotional range of
science fiction itself. Somehow in very recent times ‘empath’ has spread into
common currency, meaning someone who identifies with another’s feelings and
experience. However, ‘empath’ sounds like a type, raising the potential dilemma
of infinite variables. There could be the active empath, by contrast with the
passive empath. Can someone be a part-time empath? I imagine it happens all the
time. Maybe one could work towards a doctorate. Or become the world’s leading
empath. Though how would you know? Some variables have, in fact, already been
identified, only one of them being emotional empath: physical empath, intuitive
empath, dream empath, plant empath, Earth empath, animal empath. Can an empath
love? we are asked, only to be told yes, with anyone but it is better if it’s with
someone who expresses emotion, possibly because empaths are described as “emotional
sponges”. Marrying an empath is preferable to marrying a narcissist, needless
to say, though are the words antonyms? We are even told of the presence of
toxic empaths, who over-identify with others’ problems and adopt them as their
own. (Why this is toxic and how ‘toxic’ is today’s omnipresent negative
adjective, is another story.) About the best-known empathy story in our culture
is the Good Samaritan, a man who according to the Greek has a gut reaction to finding
this man beaten up in the middle of nowhere. I have yet to hear a sermon in
which he is called an empath, but is it only a matter of time? The implication
is that those who passed by on the other side of the road knew about empathy,
were even taught to be empathic, but one thing or another stopped them. It was
the wrong person who did the right thing, in fact a person so outside proper
society that it never occurred to the listeners (then or now) to extend empathy
to them. Figures are not in for those who chose the colours of the narcissist,
but we may assume that the figures for empath are pretty high, of whatever
scale of empathy. Only how can we tell?
Image: Wood engraving of the Good Samaritan, copied from the work of the German painter Julius Schnorr von Carolsfeld (1794-1872). published in Paris in 1860
No comments:
Post a Comment