Every
Sunday of my childhood we prayed “especially for thy Servant Elizabeth our Queen,
that under her we may be godly and quietly governed.” These were the precise
words that we expected of her governing. If the service was Matins, or Morning
Prayer, then we had not only A Prayer for the Queen’s Majesty (“…so replenish
her with the grace of thy Holy Spirit, that she may always incline to thy will,
and walk in thy way...”) but also A Prayer for the Royal Family, in which we
asked to “prosper them with all happiness.” Although we never saw these people,
they were local in our minds. Their presence was formative, their likenesses
known. That Monday we marched past the flag in the schoolyard, eyes right at
the vital moment, having just sung ‘God Save the Queen’, the national anthem.
Adult conversation took on a different tone when the subject was the Queen; it still
does. Entire banks of stored knowledge could suddenly come forth, informing
opinions political, social, and cultural about these English people. Contact
was made via hefty pictorials that detailed every step of their lives, sitting
on silken couches or meeting a foreign dignitary or riding horses through the Scottish
Highlands. Sepia annuals made way for something called colorgravure. In my
childhood we could see the Queen in most public buildings, her portrait
squarely positioned behind post office counter or bank teller’s window or
headmaster’s desk. Most commonly, though anything but commonly, it was the
Queen in her wattle-yellow gown, the 1954 portrait painting by Sir William
Dargie. As with any relationship of length, learning more about a person’s politics,
society and culture would change the childhood impressions into formed
perspectives. It was not a Prime Minister’s bouquet of “I did but see her
passing by” that made me think again, but my mother’s comment of “silly old
fellow!” A line had been crossed and it was he who crossed it. The slow
realisation that half the suburbs of our city had names associated with the
Queen’s direct ancestors started to explain the bigger meanings of power and
possession. And by the time I was a young adult, the Dismissal of the elected federal
government showed in hard relief the difference between the reality and fantasy
of the monarchy, the peculiar balancing act of all our relationships. The
closeness that we enjoyed in regard to the Queen was sustained by the established
maintenance of a distance that itself is a product of time and history. We all
know the story of her reign, having lived through the reign, most of us knowing
no other, and while we know about the scandals and such like, it is arresting
to ponder the words “godly and quietly governed”, in a world today where such
virtues are needed.
No comments:
Post a Comment