This month my
nineteen-year-old daughter talks about her first university assignments in
early childhood development. Today, by chance, I came across this unfinished piece
in the file dated June 2008: “Reading to your children is a rediscovery of the
primary worlds of your own imagination. As if for the first time you plunge
into the rivery world of Ratty and Mole, empathise (but only just) with Peter
Rabbit sent to bed without supper, and engage in fisticuffs together with Bunyip
Bluegum, Bill Barnacle, and Sam Sawnoff for possession of a self-reproducing
pudding. I presumed that my five-year-old daughter would want to wait before
setting off on the adventures of the Belgian journalist Tintin, but how presumptuous
is that. The striking colours and fine drawing of these cartoon books, their
ingenious dialogues and plot shifts, their quaintnesses and quirks, appealed
immediately. We started with the least typical of all Tintin stories, ‘The
Castafiore Emerald’. Usually, we get caught up in action, travel to foreign
locations, get into scrapes, and solve questions of high espionage. This story
takes place inside one house over a few days, its main interest being the theft
of a jewel from the collection of Madame Bianca Castafiore, a self-absorbed
opera diva who arrives on people’s doorsteps and chooses to stay. Suspects are
numerous, above all the caravan of gypsies camped near the property at the
invitation of the proprietor. Outsiders abound in Tintin, almost always turning
out to be innocent of any wrongdoing. The truth lies closer to home. It’s
apparent why children relate to the central character. Just as Lewis Carroll’s
Alice walks through wonderlands of eccentric, dysfunctional and inexplicable adults,
maintaining her authority through sheer common sense, so Tintin’s immediate
circle of friends are oddballs that only accentuate Tintin’s natural good grace
and rational responses to situations, whether elementary or alarming. Children
need and seek the balanced viewpoint of a reliable character. And Tintin has a
lot to cope with. Captain Haddock, for example. Hergé must have had a field day
developing his second main character, an alcoholic seadog retired, but not from
the grog. He is grumpy, cantankerous, prone to misjudgements. He has a short
fuse and can explode at any moment at anyone with a barrage of his signature
invective, “Billions of bilious blistering blue barnacles!” He is the irritable
foil to the affable Tintin, just like the objectionable magic pudding.
Haddock’s other occupations are reading books, smoking a pipe, and taking walks
in the countryside. This man of leisure would live out his life undisturbed if
it were not for his friend Tintin, whose high spirits and desire for sleuthing shakes
Haddock out of his easy chair. Like Tintin’s dog Snowy, Haddock can have
reservations about going on life-and-death tours of Africa or Asia, but the
thrill of the new gets the better of him. This trio are the driving force of
the narrative.” Elsewhere I summarise the plot as “based on an enigma rather
than an adventure, as much ado about nothing is only resolved in the final
frame on the last page.”
Thank you for that piece and what a lovely evocation of a sweet source. Both as a father and as a reader/writer I have always loved Tintin and my kids now read them to their children. Herge took such care with each frame as well as with the characters and stories, and it is that combination of love and craft that never ages. By the way, we shouldn't forget Prof Calculus who is an important part of the Tintin universe. The Calculus Affair is one of the best of the series for its quirkiness and combination of plot and thriller/spy elements. Thanks again. Lovely piece that will send me back to the age-worn Methuen books on my shelf.
ReplyDelete